Statement of William C. Duncan, Ph.D., General Director, Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, U.S. Office, December 18, 2000
18 December 2000
Statement of William C. Duncan, Ph.D., General Director, Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, U.S. Office, December 18, 2000WASHINGTON, Dec. 18 The following is a statement by William C. Duncan, Ph.D., General Director, of the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, U.S. Office: "As the year 2000 draws to a close so too does the U.S.-Japan Auto Framework, a five-year-old agreement born out of one of the most intense trade disputes of the last two decades. The agreement is set to expire on December 31. As discussions regarding the future of the agreement proceed, some in the U.S. parts industry are demanding that the U.S. government resurrect mechanisms of market manipulation that led to the confrontation in the first place. "In June 1995, the United States and Japan were poised on the brink of a trade war. At issue was a U.S. demand that Japanese auto companies agree to U.S. auto parts purchasing targets. The Japanese refused and the U.S. threatened to shut out luxury vehicle imports from Japan. The conflict was resolved through difficult negotiations that rejected the concept of targets and instead established an understanding designed to expand sales opportunities in Japan by letting the market work. "The agreement was successful on two counts. First, it prevented a trade war that would have had wrenching economic consequences for both countries. Second, in combination with notable structural change in the Japanese auto industry, it helped to identify and develop new opportunities for U.S. companies in Japan's market. "The trade council representing GM, Ford, and Chrysler recently stated: 'It is clear that the Japanese automobile industry has entered a period of significant change which is altering the type and degree of participation of foreign auto and auto parts companies in that market.' "Among these changes are the capital participation of U.S. companies in the Japanese industry, the growing investment by U.S. auto parts companies in Japan, the global parts purchasing of Japanese auto firms, and new vehicle distribution methods in Japan. "These positive trends confirm the wise decision to abandon targets and other market distorting mechanisms aimed at arbitrarily reducing trade deficits. As a result the automobile industry whether in America, Canada, Europe or Japan has moved far beyond the national boundaries that defined it even five years ago. "The fundamental challenge for the industry will be to build vehicles that meet the increasing demands to protect the consumer and the environment while at the same time providing the performance, convenience and quality that consumers expect. This will be accomplished on a global base with companies relying on markets as the final arbiter and with governments seeking the best balance between local environmental needs and the efficiency found in common regulatory practices. Negotiated targets and mandates, on the other hand, could interfere with this dynamic to the detriment of both the consumer and the environment."