U.S. Automotive Leather Tanners Victorious in Trade Dispute With Australian Government
21 June 2000
U.S. Automotive Leather Tanners Victorious in Trade Dispute With Australian GovernmentWASHINGTON - American automotive leather tanners prevailed today in their protracted unfair trade dispute with the Australian government and its practice of giving export subsidies to Howe & Co. Pty. Ltd., Australia's sole automotive leather tanner. Today, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) announced that it had settled its claims against Australia for its A$30 million grant to Howe in return for Howe's partial repayment of the grant and Australia's commitment to refrain from further subsidies to its automotive leather industry for a 12-year period. The announcement was hailed as a victory for the U.S. automotive leather industry, which has fought for many years for a level playing field in this sector. According to a spokesperson for the U.S. industry, American tanners suffered millions of dollars in trade damage annually as a result of the Australian government's hand-out to Howe. The settlement followed the World Trade Organization's rulings that Australia's A$30 million grant to Howe was an unlawful export subsidy and that Australia had failed to comply with its directive to withdraw the grant within 90 days. As a result, the United States could have sought authorization to retaliate against imports of Australian goods into the U.S. market. The United States initially filed a protest against Australian export subsidies to its domestic automotive leather industry in 1996. The USTR took this action after the Coalition Against Australian Leather Subsidies (CAALS) filed a petition under section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 against subsidies provided to Howe through Australia's export subsidy programs for its automotive and apparel sectors. After Australia agreed to exclude automotive leather from these two programs, the Australian government gave Howe a A$30 million grant as compensation for its loss of these export subsidies. A further challenge to this replacement subsidy resulted in the WTO rulings that would have justified U.S. retaliation against Australian trade. CAALS is comprised of U.S. automotive leather tanners, Garden State Tanning, Inc., with facilities in Maryland and Pennsylvania, and Eagle Ottawa, LLC, with facilities in Michigan and Iowa. Lauren R. Howard, a partner and international trade attorney with the Washington, D.C. law firm of Collier Shannon Scott, PLLC, represents the Coalition.