Sacramento RT Refuses to Award Rail Contract to Oregon Steel Subsidiary
26 January 2000
Board to Investigate Whether Company is 'Responsible'SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- The Sacramento Regional Transit (RT) Board of Directors voted unanimously Monday night to deny awarding a contract for steel rails to the Rocky Mountain Steel Mills subsidiary of Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. Following lengthy testimony about Oregon Steel's legal, financial and other problems, the Board voted to investigate whether the company is a responsible partner for RT's southern light rail extension. The "responsibility" investigation will include sending a delegation to the company's Pueblo, Colorado, mill and a hearing before the board on March 13th in Sacramento. In rejecting a bid utilizing Rocky Mountain Steel Mills (RMSM) rail, the board pointed to the company's repeated violations of federal and state labor and environmental laws, "serious" concerns about safety and quality, and Oregon Steel's shaky financial future. In response to testimony about the company's flaunting of air pollution laws, health and safety regulations, and labor law, RT board members said that a case had been made on several issues that warranted a denial of the contract award. "Only one direction makes any sense for the agency to take," board member Roger Dickinson said. "At least a prima-facie case has been made on a number of issues." Dickinson noted four areas where a case had been made that the company may not be responsible: rail quality; timely delivery; financial instability, specifically the company's plummeting stock price and reshuffled management; and environmental and safety violations. Bill Camp, Executive Secretary of the Sacramento Central Labor Council, representing 120,000 workers, told the board that the company is "just the kind of corporation we don't want doing business in our community. "It's our member who would have to install this rail and our members' families who would have to ride on those rails," he said. "This company has more problems than employees. It would be an outrage to award a contract with taxpayers' money to a company with such a terrible history." Board members expressed deep concern that the company is being sued by the Colorado health department for continually polluting the air in violation of state law. Concern over air pollution in Sacramento is one of the driving forces behind expanding the light rail system and directors noted they have no intention of trading air pollution in Pueblo for reductions in Sacramento. Early Withycombe, President of the Environmental Council of Sacramento (ECOS), told the board that a company which continually flouts environmental regulations and is being sued by the Colorado Health Department does not deserve to participate in Sacramento's light rail expansion. Directors also noted that Rocky Mountain Steel Mills received the second- highest OSHA fine in Colorado history for health and safety violations, and is awaiting a court decision on more than 100 charges of violating federal labor law - including the unlawful replacement with inexperienced substitutes of the veteran workers that used to make rail for the company. The cheapest qualifying bid for steel rail for the southern light rail extension was from a contractor utilizing RMSM rail, but cost is only one of many factors RT must consider under state law. Section 1103 of the California Public Contract Code defines a responsible bidder as one "who has demonstrated the attribute of trustworthiness, as well as quality, fitness, capacity and experience to satisfactorily perform the public works contract." State courts have further held that a "contractor's ability to comply with all relevant laws ... is certainly relevant to whether it is responsible." Several light rail and transit agencies in California and other states have already adopted resolutions not to purchase RMSM rail, including the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART), but Monday night's vote was the first to actually deny a pending purchase. Members of United Steelworkers Locals 2102 and 3267 went on strike against Oregon Steel's CF&I Steel subsidiary (now doing business as Rocky Mountain Steel Mills) on October 3, 1997, to protest the company's unfair labor practices and substandard contract offer. When they ended their strike three months later, management unlawfully refused to reinstate the vast majority of Steelworkers to their jobs, exposing the company to a potential back-pay liability that could reach $300 million if litigated to the end of the appeals process. Three Wall Street analysts recently downgraded their opinions of Oregon Steel's stock based on the company's performance and "adverse legal or political rulings associated with the company's ongoing dispute with the United Steel Workers of America."