Exide's New Management Changes Direction
20 January 1999
Exide's New Management Changes Direction; Provides Preliminary Estimates of Third-Quarter ResultsREADING, Pa., Jan. 19 -- The new executive management of Exide Corporation , following a review of business strategy and operations, has elected to refocus the business by pursuing high-profit opportunities rather than expansion through acquisition of market share. "Our focus will be different," explained Robert A. Lutz, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. "Rather than build the business through a pursuit of market share by simply being the high-volume supplier, we are going to concentrate on profitable business, rejecting or relinquishing business which, though high in unit sales, does not measure up in profits." Lutz, who joined Exide December 1, 1998, has been working with a management team assembled shortly after the second fiscal quarter came to an end (September 27). Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer James Diasio rejoined the organization in October while Nicholas Stratigeas was elevated in mid October to executive vice president of sales and marketing, North America Management decided, in light of investment-community consensus of the company's third- quarter results, to report its own preliminary estimates, based on information at hand, including certain strategic decisions. "Operationally, we will be short of expectations," explained Diasio. "In addition, we will be short (of expectations) as a result of decisions we made on business strategy and certain other third-quarter events. This reflects our commitment to change the basic operational premise of the company." The company expects to report results for the third quarter, which ended December 27, 1998, in the range from $(1.75) to $(1.90) per share. Of this amount, approximately $(1.00) to $(1.05) reflects the adverse consequences of the company's inability to benefit from its U.S. tax losses. Some of the more significant charges for the third quarter include: Facilities closure -- The decisions to close the Frankfort, IN, and Memphis, TN, facilities were a direct reflection of the new management philosophy and resulted in a $6.1 million charge. A change in the lead market, as well as in the company's long-term lead needs, precipitated the closure of the Memphis smelter. The move away from a volume/market-share based structure brought about the decision to abandon the plan for a centralized refurbishment center at the former Frankfort battery manufacturing plant. Russian operations -- The realities of a rapidly changing -- and deteriorating -- economic situation in Russia resulted in a $6.9 million charge. This reflects uncollectible receivables and the write off of "unsaleable" inventory specified for the Russian market. Security battery -- A $3.7 million write off of primarily inventory and equipment with no alternative use following the decision to end development of a security battery. Bad debts -- An additional write off of $3.1 million for receivables related primarily for customers going through bankruptcies (for which it has become probable that such amounts would not be collected). Severance -- A $6.5 million charge will be taken related to the termination packages of 24 executives (primary reflecting packages for the former Chairman/President/CEO and executive vice president/President of North American operations). These executives left during the third quarter. Interest-rate swap agreements -- As discussed in the second-quarter Form 10-Q, the company expensed an amendment fee of $6 million which was paid to the counter party to its interest-rate swap agreements related to its 10-percent Senior Notes. In addition to these third-quarter situations which will affect earnings, the company is in negotiations with a major national account which could result in relinquishing between two-thirds and all of the business with this account. Any financial impact would be reflected in the fourth quarter or beyond. Lutz's revised approach to Exide's business strategy reflects lessons learned in the automotive industry where he had been Vice-Chairman and Chief Operating Officer for the Chrysler Corporation. "Volume and market share had been king in the auto business," he explained. "And blind pursuit of a piece of all segments has gotten a lot of car companies into trouble. "We realized the key was building products efficiently and at a profit. We would develop and market products in segments in which we could effectively compete, while ignoring other ones. We also decided to concentrate on high- profit segments like trucks and sport utilities, knowing that any success in these would be rewarded. "At Exide we will look at the world battery market, decide which segments make the most sense for us to pursue and then apply our resources accordingly. And we will not sign customers simply for the glamour of the deal or the numbers to be built! "Again, we will be looking at business in a different, new way. This change will be reflected in actions which may affect our bottom line. These may be difficult decisions, but they will be necessary." Exide Corporation is the world's leading manufacturer of automotive and industrial lead- acid batteries. Sales exceeded $2.2 billion in fiscal year 1998. The company has operations in 19 countries. Exide has additional interest in related technologies including battery chargers, accessories, starters and alternators. Further information about Exide is available at http://www.exideworld.com. Certain statements in this press release may constitute forward-looking statements under the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. As such, they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results of the company to be materially different from any results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These are enumerated in further detail in the company's Form 10-K.