Mack Files Federal Complaint Against EPA
16 June 1998
Mack Files Federal Complaint Against EPALEHIGH VALLEY, Pa., June 15 -- Threatened with EPA actions that could have a severe and long-lasting impact on employment and its competitive position, Mack Trucks, Inc. today sought federal court protection and a declaration that the company has not violated the Clean Air Act. Filed in the U.S. District Court's Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the complaint states that the EPA wrongfully asserts that certain of Mack's engines, which pass EPA's own test for measuring compliance with emissions levels, are designed to operate differently on the road than they do during the test. Based on this incorrect assertion, the EPA is now proposing unwarranted penalties that would cause massive and irreparable injury to the company. "Mack has always worked cooperatively with the EPA to reduce engine emissions, and we're very proud of the strides we've made," said Mack Executive Vice President and General Counsel Terrence C. Grube. "If the agency would like to change emissions standards or testing procedures in the future, we'd be happy to help in that process -- but we refuse to sit still in the face of assertions that we have ever violated the law." Mack and the other major diesel engine manufacturers have continuously improved the emissions performance of their products. Over the past 20 years, the manufacturers have reduced regulated nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions by more than 70 percent and lowered particulate emissions by 90 percent. Further, the industry and the EPA cooperatively reached a voluntary agreement to reduce urban NOx emissions another 50 percent by 2004. The Mack complaint points out that the company's engines have consistently passed federal emissions tests and have consistently been certified by the EPA. Furthermore, it points out that the injection timing system now targeted by EPA (versions of which are used by every heavy-duty engine manufacturer) has been known to that agency for several years. Prior to conversations the agency initiated with the heavy-duty engine industry about six months ago, the EPA has never indicated in any way that the use of these systems might be unlawful. The complaint emphasizes that Mack's engines are not altered in any way after testing -- that is, they operate on the road in the same fashion as they do during the federal test. Mack has asked the court to declare that its injection timing system does not constitute an illegal "defeat device"; to prohibit the EPA from revoking its current certificates of conformity or denying those certificates for the 1999 model year; and to prevent the agency from seeking or assessing any penalties against Mack.