JAMA: Pessimism about Japan Auto Agreement Based on Insufficient Analysis
13 November 1997
Administration's Pessimistic Conclusions on Japan Auto Agreement Are Based on Insufficient Analysis, JAMA Newsletter Reports TodayWASHINGTON, Nov. 13 -- Administration statements expressing discouragement with progress under the US-Japan Auto Framework Agreement are based on an insufficient examination of changes taking place in Japan's automotive markets and in some cases overstated data, according to Japan Auto Trends released today. "Careful analysis and the facts show that instead of the US Trade Representative's (USTR) assessment that there is 'little cause for optimism,' there is actually considerable cause for optimism," said William C. Duncan, General Director, Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association USA (JAMA). Among the points brought out in Japan Auto Trends: -- The Big Three auto companies and the Clinton Administration blame the 11.8% decline in car import sales in Japan so far this year (through September) on lack of market access. Yet the bulk of the decline is due to a 51.4% decline in imports from Japanese-owned plants in the U.S. Imports from non-Japanese companies fell only 2.3%, only slightly more than the overall 1% decline in the market. -- Big Three car imports into Japan fell 20% due to weak consumer acceptability of certain product lines, notably the Ford Taurus, Chevrolet Cavalier, and Chrysler Neon. Overall Ford sales fell 42%. Other importers increased sales, notably Rover up nearly 15%, VW up over 6% and Audi up 14%. "This data proves that the decline in import sales in Japan so far this year is due to product, not market access." -- A slow increase in new dealerships reflects company strategy, not access. A new study shows that importers in Japan, including the Big Three, are consolidating dealers for efficiency -- to gain more sales from existing dealerships. They have not been significantly expanding their overall number of dealerships. -- A US government report overstates the size of Japan's auto parts replacement market raising unrealistic expectations -- the market is about $10 billion, not the Administration's estimated $65 billion. "The agreement was designed to create and develop opportunities in Japan's market. It was not designed either as a device to force market share through numerical targets or worse yet as a setup to close the US market. If opportunities are to be recognized, the market must be scrutinized for all its parts and not hidden in an overstated whole," Duncan concluded. Japan Auto Trends is a bi-monthly publication examining developments in Japan's auto markets. This month's issue comes with a new statistical insert detailing sales of imports by company, by country and by market segment. The publication is also available on the JAMA Web site -- http://www.japanauto.com. JAMA, headquartered in Tokyo, has offices in Brussels, Singapore and Washington, DC. SOURCE Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc.