Judge's Decision Vindicates Meritor Automotive's Position In Eaton Patent Claim
6 November 1997
Judge's Decision Vindicates Meritor Automotive's Position In Eaton Patent ClaimTROY, Mich., Nov. 6 -- Meritor Automotive, Inc. said today that a U.S. District Court judge's ruling in a patent dispute with Eaton Corp. supports Meritor's position that Eaton's claims are groundless. In an opinion filed Nov. 4 in Delaware, U.S. District Court Judge Joseph F. Farnan, Jr. denied a request by Eaton for a preliminary injunction against Meritor. Last July, Eaton filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Meritor's previous parent company, Rockwell International Corporation , claiming that the company had infringed on a truck transmission patent. Since then, Meritor has become a separate, independent company. A preliminary injunction would have required Meritor to halt sales of its Engine Synchro Shift(TM) (ESS) transmission until the matter was resolved at trial. "We believe that Judge Farnan's ruling vindicates our position," said David Greenfield, Meritor's General Counsel. "It clearly indicates that Eaton faces an uphill battle if it chooses to proceed to trial." Meritor recently filed a motion for a summary judgment, asking the judge to dismiss Eaton's lawsuit altogether. Meritor, with 1996 sales of $3.1 billion, is a global supplier of a broad range of components and systems for commercial, specialty and light vehicles. Meritor consists of two businesses: Heavy Vehicle Systems, a leading supplier of drivetrain systems and components for medium- and heavy-duty trucks, trailers, off-highway equipment and specialty vehicles; and Light Vehicle Systems, a major supplier of roof, door, access control and seat adjusting systems, electric motors and electronic controls, suspension system and wheels for passenger cars, light trucks and sport utility vehicles. SOURCE Meritor Automotive, Inc.