AAMA Reaction to Administration's Position on the Proposed UN Global Climate Treaty
22 October 1997
Statement by Andrew H. Card, Jr., President and CEO of the American Automobile Manufacturers Association, In Reaction to President Clinton's Announcement of the Administration's Position on the Proposed UN Global Climate TreatyWASHINGTON, Oct. 22 -- Andrew H. Card, Jr., President and CEO of the American Automobile Manufacturers Association, made the following statement in reaction to President Clinton's announcement of the administration's position on the proposed UN global climate treaty. "Now that the White House has finally released its proposal, the national debate can truly begin, Americans must now decide whether they are willing to support a treaty that provides little or no environmental benefit, exempts 80 percent of the world's nations from any binding commitments, and forces the U.S. to go on a strict energy diet that could raise the price of nearly everything they buy. "We are deeply concerned that the Administration's proposal will erode the competitiveness of U.S. industry, result in lost jobs, and diminish consumer choice. If adopted, the U.S. can expect soaring production costs and significantly higher driving costs -- through rationing schemes, energy taxes or other mechanisms with comparable effect. Any treaty that does not require the full participation of developing countries could put the U.S. at a major competitive disadvantage. "America's Car Companies have worked hard to increase energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions -- and their efforts are paying off. Since 1974, new car fuel economy has doubled, while light truck fuel economy has increased by 55 percent. Chrysler, Ford and General Motors continue to work with the government on new technologies through the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles (PNGV). But further advances will require breakthrough technology that cannot be driven by a treaty timetable. "The U.S. Senate has already unanimously passed a resolution opposing a treaty that lets the developing world off the hook and would put the U.S. at an economic disadvantage. The American people also will be hard pressed to accept any treaty that doesn't improve our environment and exempts the developing world from any specific commitments while resulting in higher prices, lifestyle changes and job losses." SOURCE American Automobile Manufacturers Association