The Auto Channel
The Largest Independent Automotive Research Resource
The Largest Independent Automotive Research Resource
Official Website of the New Car Buyer

Consumers Union responds to White House Fuel Economy action


PHOTO

TACH's TAKE: How Can Such Smart People Be So Stupid About Ethanol
TACH's TAKE: The New York Times Buys Into CAFE 54.5 Obfuscation (Orig Published August 14, 2016)
TACH's TAKE: Give Consumers Real Choice; Replace MPG with C.P.M. and Replace Regular(E10) With Flex-Fuel(E85) It's That Simple!


From: Consumers Union Public Policy and Advocacy Division of Consumer Reports

Weakening Fuel Economy Standards Is a Bad Deal for Consumers

WASHINGTON, DC - March 15, 2017: Consumers Union, the policy and mobilization arm of Consumer Reports, today responded to the Environmental Protection Agency's withdrawal of its final determination for fuel economy standards for new cars and trucks for model years 2022 through 2025.

Shannon Baker-Branstetter, policy counsel for Consumers Union, said, "The Administration should reconsider today's action. The EPA finalized the standards after a thorough study of costs and benefits. A decision to withdraw the standards is nonsensical, as it would merely funnel more money to oil companies at consumers' expense and halt the progress that can be made in both savings for consumers and vehicle efficiency. The standards already take the cost into account, and the record shows that they are a reasonable, cost-effective approach to improving fuel efficiency and lowering consumers’ expenses.

"EPA conducted a robust review of these standards for nearly two years, taking into account the input from automakers, including thousands of pages of technology and cost assessments, and concluded that the standards were appropriate."By rejecting the EPA’s final determination now, its new Administrator is signaling the agency plans to weaken the standards instead."

Consumers Union recently issued a new report (http://consumersunion.org/news/cu-car-affordability-report/);debunking industry claims that fuel economy standards have hurt vehicle affordability. "The study examined the price of vehicles over the last 20 years and found that prices remained steady even as fuel economy improved. The findings show that all households benefit from improved fuel economy, but particularly lower-income households who spend a higher percentage of their income on fuel. Thanks to improved fuel economy, an average new car buyer in 2015 saved $523 in fuel costs annually when compared to an average 2005 vehicle.

As Baker-Branstetter noted, "Fuel economy and safety have both improved while vehicle sales have hit new records and, as our new report shows, entry-level car prices have remained steady.

"Unlike other updates found in today's vehicles -- like new luxury, convenience and technology upgrades -- fuel economy technologies are the only ones that pay for themselves. In our studies of the fuel economy standards, we found consumers could expect significant net fuel savings; up to $3,200 per car and $4,800 per truck; over the life of the vehicle, even with low gas prices. Weakening the standard now would mean consumers would lose out on some of those savings. For middle class families struggling to pay bills, raising costs at the pump is a bad deal.

FULL REPORT:

New Analysis: Fuel Economy Technology Has Lowered Fuel Costs for Consumers, While Vehicle Prices Remained Steady

The report directly counters automaker concerns that rising fuel economy standards hurt low-income families

March 6, 2017

WASHINGTON – A new report out today from Consumers Union, the policy and mobilization division of Consumer Reports, finds that car buyers are getting better fuel efficiency at a lower cost, while vehicle prices have remained steady. The report finds that new car prices have remained relatively flat over the past 20 years, and used car prices have actually fallen, while fuel economy continued to increase. The findings rebut automaker claims that increasing fuel efficiency hurts car buyers.

“The new analysis demonstrates that fuel efficient technology pays for itself and is a boon to car and truck buyers that benefit from the savings greater efficiency offers,” said Shannon Baker-Branstetter, policy counsel for Consumers Union. “In fact, had it not been for fuel economy standards, the average consumer would be paying $523 more in annual fuel spending.

“Multiplied by millions of new cars each year, that’s billions of dollars going back into our economy, and supporting thousands of jobs. Fuel economy standards are a win-win for everyone,” said Baker-Branstetter.”

The report looks at the latest consumer spending data to explore how new and used car prices have changed over the last two decades and examines other factors that affect affordability of new cars for low to moderate-income households. The report makes a number of key conclusions, including:

  • Car buyers are enjoying higher fuel economy than before – and they are paying less for it. The report finds that the average price of new cars and light-duty trucks has remained relatively flat since 1997, while prices of used vehicles have fallen slightly. Over the same period of time, average fuel economy of cars and trucks has continued to improve.
  • Fuel efficiency improvements have been a boon for consumers. If fuel economy had not improved from 2005 through 2015, households would have spent 25 percent more on fuel in 2015 than they actually did, approximately $523 annually.
  • The price of entry-level vehicles has remained approximately the same over the past 10 years. The most affordable vehicle among the top 30 sold in 2015 cost the same (in real terms) as the most affordable top 30 vehicle sold in 2005. Meanwhile, the price of the most expensive of the top 30 vehicle increased by 40 percent between 2005 and 2015.
  • While the prices of new and used cars have remained flat or have fallen in real terms, low-income households are under increasing financial pressure from higher prices of other household goods and stagnant wages. The average prices of all goods have increased by about 50% over the last 20 years, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Education and gasoline costs have risen even faster. Higher prices have been accompanied by stagnant wages, leaving low-income households behind in an otherwise growing economy.

An earlier Consumers Union study found that owners of vehicles that meet the 2025 fuel economy standards could expect to save $3,200 per car and $4,800 per truck, even with low gas prices, over the vehicle’s lifetime. Those savings will increase if gas prices go back up. The benefits of improved efficiency in new vehicles also make their way to the used car market, which accounts for 70 percent of vehicle sales annually. Low-income households spend a higher share of their income on fuel (4.3% of annual income, compared to 0.9% for the highest earners), and are more likely to purchase a vehicle in the used car market. Higher fuel economy standards lessen the financial strain on low-income household budgets, whether they buy new or used vehicles.

“Lobbyists for the automaker and oil industries have been making a concerted effort to weaken fuel economy standards in recent months. As this report illustrates, if they succeed in rolling back the standards, it would hurt consumers, especially the lower-income buyers they purport to speak for,” according to Baker-Branstetter.

“Fuel economy standards ensure cars and trucks go farther on less gas and save Americans money, while helping working-class and lower-income families the most. These standards help protect consumer choice, ensuring that no matter what kind of vehicle a consumer wants or needs to drive, he or she can buy a more efficient model that saves money on gas.”

A full copy of the report is available here.

CU and CFA Letter to President Trump on EPA Fuel Economy Standards

February 23, 2017

 

President Donald J. Trump
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave
Washington, D.C. 20500

Dear Mr. President:

On behalf of Consumers Union and the Consumer Federation of America, we ask that you maintain the strong fuel economy standards established by the Environmental Protection Agency. These standards help to lower fuel costs for middle class families across the country, support job creation and innovation, and improve air quality.

Rolling back fuel economy standards would hurt hard-working, middle-class Americans and small businesses that rely on a car or truck for their livelihood. Even at today’s lower prices, gasoline is a major expense for a majority of American families. Fuel economy standards are a cost-effective way to save consumers money on fuel. In fact, Consumers Union’s research shows that consumers would enjoy net savings of $3,200 per car and $4,800 per truck, over the life of a vehicle that meet the 2025 standards, even at today’s low gas prices. If gas prices rise, which we expect they will, the savings would be significantly higher. And when consumers save money, they spend it on local goods and services, helping to further boost the economy and encourage more job growth.

Rolling back the standards will rob consumers of these savings, providing them with less expendable income. For families struggling to cover basic needs, this would be an added burden. Improving fuel efficiency in cars and trucks not only saves money today, but help provide families with a bit of insurance against future gas price increases. In fact, strong majorities of consumers across the political spectrum value fuel economy standards—our recent surveys and polls show that about 80% of Americans support the standards.

Thanks to fuel economy standards, the automakers have invested in innovative technologies to improve fuel economy, and their efforts have paid off. Automakers have not only met today’s fuel economy standards, but they have exceeded the standards in many cases, all while enjoying record profits and record sales. Many cars and trucks available today outperform standards set for 2020 and 2021. And one of the great features of the fuel economy standards is that they are flexible and adapt to the vehicles consumers actually buy–as consumer demand has shifted toward larger vehicles, automakers’ targets have also lowered because larger vehicles have lower efficiency targets. The standards help improve consumer choices across the entire fleet regardless of the size of vehicles consumers choose to buy.  Finally, the standards will go a long way to keeping the car companies from again needing a bailout as they did when their lots were filled with unsold inefficient vehicles the last time gas prices peaked.

Consumers are relying on fuel economy standards to lower their fuel costs in the future. Staying the course on fuel economy supports working families and increases American jobs, which are top priorities for our nation.

 

Sincerely,

Shannon Baker-Branstetter                                  Jack Gillis
Consumers Union                                                   Consumer Federation of America

 

Cc: Administrator G. Scott Pruitt, EPA

Secretary Elaine Chao, DOT

Kevin Green, DOT

Bill Charmley, EPA

Chris Grundler, EPA

Michael Olechiw EPA

Rebecca Yoon, NHTSA

James Tamm, NHTSA

Mike McCarthy, CARB

Annette Hebert, CARB