The Auto Channel
The Largest Independent Automotive Research Resource
The Largest Independent Automotive Research Resource
Official Website of the New Car Buyer

Why Do Small Engines Suffer From Ethanol Problems? +VIDEO


HINT - They don't!

By Marc J. Rauch
Exec. Vice President/Co-Publisher

          Originally published September 1, 2015
          Updated May 30, 2018

PHOTO (select to view enlarged photo)
Marc Rauch with Yamaha/Star Bolt and the Aircraft Carrier MIDWAY in San Diego

I recently responded to a knucklehead online radio broadcast that featured Lauren Fix bashing ethanol, something she has done in the past even though ethanol is something that she seems to be completely unable to discuss with any accurate information. The broadcast was an episode of "The Jacki Daily Show," hosted by Jacki Pick. The complete episode and my comments can be found by CLICKING HERE.

But this editorial is not really related to Ms. Pick's interview of Ms. Fix, it concerns a short comment made at the beginning of the show as Jacki Pick read an email that was supposedly written by a male colleague of hers. This is what she read on-air: "I ruined a weed trimmer and a chainsaw on this stupid E15 ethanol gasoline."

The alleged writer of the email didn't offer any further details of what he meant by "ruined," and Ms. Pick didn't elaborate any further on the issue other than to use it as the springboard to introduce Lauren Fix to the show.

However, this comment is just one instance of negative claims made against ethanol in regard to small internal combustion engines (two-stroke engines). These are the engines typically found in lawn and garden equipment, motorcycles, and boats.

There are three complaints made about ethanol-gasoline fuel blends. The first is that the ethanol causes sludge, tar, gunk, goo, crap (or whatever you want to call it) to appear in the fuel tank, thereby clogging the filter, spark plugs, fuel injectors, carburetors, etc.

The second complaint is that the ethanol corrodes the rubber hoses and some metal parts.

The third is that the ethanol in the fuel-blend magically sucks water right out of the air and drops it in your fuel tank.

Of the three, I'd say that the first - "the sludge quagmire" is the most often heard. And without knowing anything further about what Jacki Pick's colleague was referring to, I'd say that this is what he might have meant - assuming that the email was real and not just a device to open the show.

To get to the bottom of this issue, basic questions must be asked:

Question #1 - Does sludge/goo/gunk/crap form in an internal combustion engine? The answer is yes.

Question #2 - Is the sludge/goo/gunk/crap because of ethanol? The answer is no; it is because of the gasoline and oil used in the fuel.

While ethanol is a fuel, it is also a very effective solvent. Solvents are used to clean and remove the residue and deposits left after a substance has been used, such as the residue and deposits left after gasoline and/or oil is burned.

Gasoline is also a solvent, but it's not as effective a solvent as ethanol. Gasoline and petroleum oil products are, however, very effective in leaving residue. They are champs in leaving behind deposits.

In short, if you were choosing up sides to compete in a national residue-making competition, you would be better to select gasoline or petroleum oil for your team. But if you were choosing teammates for a national clean-up competition, you'd be better off to pick ethanol.

How much more residue does gasoline or a gasoline-oil combination create as compared to ethanol? Watch this video from 2009 to find out:

Now, imagine that the glass jars shown in the video are the insides of an internal combustion engine. Imagine, if instead of burning just fuel-soaked wicks for a few seconds, you were to burn the fuel-soaked wicks for an hour or two every day for a week, a month, a year. Based on the results of the video, could you imagine that the residue and deposits from the gasoline and gasoline-oil fuels would be caked on? Would the residue be a half-inch deep? Would it be 1 inch deep? More than 1 inch?

Would the caked on residue affect the functionality of an engine's pistons? Would the solid caked-on bits break off and affect the functionality of other parts of the engine? Of course it would. This is one of the reasons why engines fail and why mechanics have to clean out an engine. To mitigate this problem gasoline companies add "detergents" to the gasoline to help dissolve the build up. If gasoline was a more effective solvent it might be able to remove the residue that used-gasoline creates.

In an article published by on June 29, 2013; Gregg Laskoski wrote about automakers' efforts to encourage the development of more effective gasoline detergents. Mr. Laskoski is Sr. Petroleum Analyst at GasBuddy and, interestingly enough, had been Managing Director of Public Relations at AAA Auto Club South. Here's are some excerpts from that article:

"The automakers formed a consortium, Top Tier Gasoline, that certifies retailers as meeting their standard for detergent. They say it's necessary because detergents prevent deposits of leftover material from building up in engines and exhaust systems. The deposits are like the ash that remains in a fireplace, and their presence in your car's engine can reduce fuel economy and performance."

"We strongly recommend Top Tier detergent gasoline to keep your engine clean,” GM fuel specialist Bill Studzinski said. “Fuel economy, emissions and acceleration all suffer when there are deposits in an engine."

I hope you noticed that there isn't one single mention of ethanol in these two paragraphs that attribute the deposits and residue problem to ethanol. And if you have the opportunity to read the entire article you'll see that the word ethanol never appears anywhere in the text of the story.


Let me take you in a different direction. Imagine having a fuel that creates much less residue and is a very effective solvent at the same time. In other words, something that might make a small mess, and then cleans up after itself...along with cleaning up the mess left by the petroleum-based fuels. Isn't that better? How could it not be better?

But wait, some engines do have problems with sludge, tar, gunk, goo, crap (or whatever you want to call it) after the fuel has been switched to ethanol or an ethanol blend. There, I said it; I admitted it.

If you could fault ethanol fuels for anything, it's that they are too efficient at cleaning the residue and deposits. But that's like complaining that your toothpaste whitens too much; that your hand soap gets too much dirt off your hands; that your greasy pots and pans clean up too quickly.

PHOTO (select to view enlarged photo)
Gasoline damages engines

If you have an engine that has used some type of gasoline fuel or gasoline-oil fuel then the engine will have substantial deposits throughout, and you will have to have it serviced. You will have to change filters, spark plugs, anything and everything that comes in contact with the burned fuel deposits. Through the life of the engine and the device that the engine powers, you will have to do this, maybe multiple times.

The good news is that once you have had this service completed ethanol-gasoline fuels will keep your engine clean longer and better than any non-ethanol gasoline with detergent. Mercury Marine, the world's largest manufacturer of boat engines agrees with this. You can listen to their entire Ethanol Seminar webcast by CLICKING HERE.

So if petroleum oil products, like gasoline and diesel, are the cause of the build up of all the engine "ash," or engine "plaque," then why do some people and organizations claim that ethanol is the cause of the problem?

Well, you could say it's a lie to blame ethanol. In fact, I will say it: It's a lie.

You saw the video demonstration above, you read the quotes from the article, and if you have just the most rudimentary knowledge of internal combustion engines then you know that what I've written is true. Then why don't people who are supposed to be experts in automotive care not know this very rudimentary information? Shouldn't they be embarrassed to show their faces in public?


Automobile and engine parts break. They wear down. They corrode. It's what they do; it's what they've done since movable device were invented. Human parts do the same, by the way. The auto parts and engine repair industries didn't start with Congress' passing of the Renewable Fuel Standard. There were parts stores all over America and all over the world for dozens and dozens and dozens of years. There have been engine repairman forever. The question is, "Is ethanol more corrosive to engine parts more than gasoline?" The answer is that at the worst, it is no more corrosive than gasoline, and in some instances it is less corrosive.

If you're prone to dislike ethanol you will now say, "Yeah, then why does my engine mechanic (or father or uncle or husband) say it is?" The easiest answer is that they either don't know, and they're just passing along bad information that they've heard, or that they needed an excuse so they used ethanol as the villain. In short, they misdiagnosed the cause.

At this point, the disbelievers say, "Bu*l Sh*t!"

There's two ways to prove the point. One way is by using a visual presentation of the comparative corrosive effects, and the other is by a scientific comparison. Let's first look at the video tests conducted by Jacob Kaul; you'll see how after just a short period of time fuel line hoses react to being exposed to different fuels:

Here's two videos of long term tests conducted by Erron Spalsbury that prove that ethanol fuels do not cause damage to metals or rubber hoses:

Here's a video about testing E85 in lawn mower engines that was conducted by Owensboro Technical College:

Now let's look at scientific comparisons. A company called Custom Advanced Connections has a website that compares a wide variety of chemicals with different types of rubber ( They provide the results via both a dynamic database and a static list. Some of the direct links to information are:

The results show that ethanol is the least harmful compared to gasoline and the various "aromatic" substances. The one type of rubber that shows ethanol to be slightly less compatible, and at the same time shows gasoline and the aromatics to be better than ethanol, is Viton, Fluoroelastomer (FKM). In any event, the rating for ethanol is still in the highly acceptable category, and no where close to the "severe damage - not recommended categories that gasoline and aromatics fall into with natural rubber, silicone, and neoprene, to name a few.

PHOTO (select to view enlarged photo)
Ethanol vs Rubbers
PHOTO (select to view enlarged photo)
Denatured Alcohol vs Rubbers
PHOTO (select to view enlarged photo)
Gasoline vs Rubbers

PHOTO (select to view enlarged photo)
Benzene vs Rubbers
PHOTO (select to view enlarged photo)
Toluene vs Rubbers
PHOTO (select to view enlarged photo)
Xylene vs Rubbers

Viton, Fluoroelastomer is a rubber invented by Dupont in the 1950's and first used in automobiles in the late 1950's. There are two important points about this:

    • The first is that Dupont was one of the three partners in the leaded-gasoline patents (with General Motors and Standard Oil), and because of gasoline's - especially leaded gasoline's - corrosive characteristics, Dupont obviously had it in their best interest to develop a rubber that was very resistant to leaded gasoline.

    • The second point is that the use of Viton in automobile engine components beginning only in the late 1950's would explain why ethanol and ethanol-gasoline blends in all the previous years never caused any problems, and why there is an absence of reports citing ethanol-related damage during the many decades that ethanol-gasoline blends were extensively used outside of the United States (this is the salient point behind the editorial I published in December 2017 - The Hypocrisy of Big Oil).

Another website of another company, Graco, Inc., provides a similar comparison, but they also include metal substances. Ethanol is ranked slightly lower than some varieties of gasoline with metals - but still in the "good to excellent range" - and about equal to benzene, toluene, and xylene. These results and comparisons puts to rest any claim that ethanol is harmful (or more harmful) to metals that might be used in an internal combustion engine and fuel system.


A third resource is the website for CPLabSafety. They specifically analyze and compare different chemicals to aluminum, and it shows similar results to the Graco website metals comparison. One interesting result is that "high aromatic gasoline" ranks as not recommended for use with aluminum in both the Graco and CalPacLab comparisons.

Sometimes, it's claimed that ethanol damages plastics. However, you can store ethanol in ordinary plastic water bottles. Aromatics (benzene, toluene, and Xylene), the substances used to replace ethanol in E0, are far less compatible with different types of plastics. See a comparison chart at The CPLabSafety website confirms ethanol's compatibility with plastics with the charts at


No, absolutely not. It is a ridiculous myth. I wrote and published an extensive paper on this issue, which you can find at Ethanol Does NOT Suck Water Out Of The Air.


How do the slimebags that work for API get away with this? How do media whores hired by the oil industry get away with repeating information that are ridiculous downright lies? Why are there any small engine mechanics that don't understand this - they should all be at the forefront to argue for ethanol, not against ethanol. How can you trust a mechanic that can't or won't diagnose a simple problem correctly?

In the broadest terms possible it could be said that all fuels used in any type of engine will contribute to the engine breaking down. It could be a spark-induced internal combustion engine, a compression-ignited internal combustion engine, a steam engine, a water or wind turbine, or an electric motor; they all break down, and the fuel that supplies the power helps to cause it. Engines have moving parts; moving parts wear down. Internal combustion engines suffer from thousands of small explosions per minute.

When the anti-ethanol people talk about a fuel damaging an engine they make it seem as if only ethanol causes the wear and tear. They make it seem as if the gasoline somehow cushions the explosions or coats the engine components to prevent deposits from forming. This is a lie. This lie is told to keep us subservient to the oil industry and the terrorist countries that are the key suppliers. There is no fuel used in an internal combustion engine that is worse for the engine than gasoline. Gasoline damages engines. Small engines suffer from gasoline problems. Ethanol helps to clean the engines.

If gasoline was not harmful to engines, America would not have had thousands of engine repair shops and mechanics spread throughout the country in all the years during the age of leaded gasoline.

Small engines and big engines don't suffer from ethanol problems, they suffer from gasoline problems.

Special thanks to Al Fletch for his contributions to the information contained in the materials comparison section.