President Obama's Remarks on U.S. Auto Industry
This morning the President
announced that his Auto Task Force has completed its evaluation of the
viability of General Motors and Chrysler in light of their requests for
federal assistance. In addition to releasing the viability assessments, he
also released a new policy with the American government guaranteeing
warrantees for cars from those companies to ensure that if you have one it
"will be safer than it's ever been":
- Fact Sheet on the New Path to Viability for GM & Chrysler (pdf) >>
- Warrantee Commitment Program Explanation (pdf) >>
- GM Viability Assessment (pdf) >>
- Chrysler Viability Assessment (pdf) >>
In the course of his remarks, the
President pledged in no uncertain terms that he would not simply stand by
and watch the American auto industry fail. He pledged to work with Congress
on further action. And he made clear that the government has no interest in
running these companies.
In broader terms, he laid out early what
led to his decisions announced today, the bottom line being that the Task
Force has determined the companies’ submitted plans to restructure
simply do not go far enough:
And so today I'm announcing that my
administration will offer GM and Chrysler a limited additional period of
time to work with creditors, unions, and other stakeholders to
fundamentally restructure in a way that would justify an investment of
additional taxpayer dollars. During this period they must produce plans
that would give the American people confidence in their long-term prospects
for success.
Now, what we're asking for is
difficult. It will require hard choices by companies. It will require
unions and workers who have already made extraordinarily painful
concessions to do more. It'll require creditors to recognize that they
can't hold out for the prospect of endless government bailouts. It'll have
to -- it will require efforts from a whole host of other stakeholders,
including dealers and suppliers. Only then can we ask American taxpayers
who have already put up so much of their hard-earned money to once more
invest in a revitalized auto industry.
But I'm confident that if each are
willing to do their part, if all of us are doing our part, then this
restructuring, as painful as it will be in the short term, will mark not an
end, but a new beginning for a great American industry -- an auto industry
that is once more out-competing the world; a 21st century auto industry
that is creating new jobs, unleashing new prosperity, and manufacturing the
fuel-efficient cars and trucks that will carry us towards an
energy-independent future. I am absolutely committed to working with
Congress and the auto companies to meet one goal: The United States of
America will lead the world in building the next generation of clean
cars.
He laid out his prescription for
GM:
GM has made a good faith effort to
restructure over the past several months -- but the plan that they've put
forward is, in its current form, not strong enough. However, after broad
consultation with a range of industry experts and financial advisors, I'm
absolutely confident that GM can rise again, providing that it undergoes a
fundamental restructuring. As an initial step, GM is announcing today that
Rick Wagoner is stepping aside as Chairman and CEO. This is not meant as a
condemnation of Mr. Wagoner, who's devoted his life to this company and has
had a distinguished career; rather, it's a recognition that will take new
vision and new direction to create the GM of the future.
In this context, my administration
will offer General Motors adequate working capital over the next 60 days.
And during this time, my team will be working closely with GM to produce a
better business plan. They must ask themselves: Have they consolidated
enough unprofitable brands? Have they cleaned up their balance sheets, or
are they still saddled with so much debt that they can’t make future
investments? Above all, have they created a credible model for how not
only to survive, but to succeed in this competitive global market?
And he explained the differences
underlying his prescription for Chrysler:
The situation at Chrysler is more
challenging. It's with deep reluctance but also a clear-eyed recognition
of the facts that we've determined, after careful review, that Chrysler
needs a partner to remain viable. Recently, Chrysler reached out and found
what could be a potential partner -- the international car company Fiat,
where the current management team has executed an impressive turnaround.
Fiat is prepared to transfer its cutting-edge technology to Chrysler and,
after working closely with my team, has committed to build -- building new
fuel-efficient cars and engines right here in the United States. We've
also secured an agreement that will ensure that Chrysler repays taxpayers
for any new investments that are made before Fiat is allowed to take a
majority ownership stake in Chrysler.
Still, such a deal would require an
additional investment of taxpayer dollars, and there are a number of
hurdles that must be overcome to make it work. I'm committed to doing all
I can to see if a deal can be struck in a way that upholds the interests of
American taxpayers. And that's why we'll give Chrysler and Fiat 30 days to
overcome these hurdles and reach a final agreement -- and we will provide
Chrysler with adequate capital to continue operating during that time. If
they are able to come to a sound agreement that protects American
taxpayers, we will consider lending up to $6 billion to help their plan
succeed. But if they and their stakeholders are unable to reach such an
agreement, and in the absence of any other viable partnership, we will not
be able to justify investing additional tax dollars to keep Chrysler in
business.
He ended on a hopeful note, however,
making clear that his decisions were not made out of despair, but out of
certainty that the ingenuity and determination Americans and these
companies have shown for decades.