Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles Far Better Choice Than Coal-to-Liquid Fuel Projects, Say Carnegie Mellon Experts
Researchers from Tepper School of Business warn that failure to use carbon capture and sequestration would actually increase emissions from such projects
PITTSBURGH, June 7, 2007; WHO: Lester Lave, professor of economics at the Tepper School of Business and co-director of the Carnegie Mellon Electricity Industry Center, and Jay Apt, executive director of the Electricity Industry Center. WHAT: Comments/perspective on House Committee on Energy and Commerce proposal to subsidize production of transportation fuel from coal to-liquid projects. "A major program to subsidize coal-to-liquids makes no sense, since the goals of energy independence and reducing greenhouse gas emissions can be achieved at lower cost through plug-in hybrid vehicles charged with electricity from reduced carbon sources," according to an Issue Brief by the Carnegie Mellon Electricity Industry Center. WHY: The House Committee on Energy and Commerce is considering enacting policies to subsidize the production of transportation fuel from coal-to-liquid projects. Tepper School of Business researchers determined plug-in hybrid electric vehicles are a far better and less costly choice. -- Generating electricity from coal with carbon capture and sequestration and replacing the fleet with plug-in hybrid vehicles could enhance energy security by reducing 85% of motor vehicle gasoline use and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from vehicle travel by 70%. -- Even the most carbon-intensive scenario using plug-in hybrids has substantially less greenhouse gas emissions than the best possible coal-to-liquids case. -- Nearly three-fourths of the existing light-duty vehicle fleet could be accommodated as plug-ins without requiring additional power plants through off-peak charging.