Kerkorian, DaimlerChrysler Head to Court Over 1998 "Merger Of Equals"
We bet you can't find it anywhere else on the net!!!
CLICK4Video AutoLine Detroit Special Merger Story - June 1,1998
CLICK4 Merger! TACH News Story - May 7, 1998
DETROIT December 1, 2003; John Porretto writing for the AP reported that one side calls it a merger of equals, a trans-Atlantic union that created a global automotive giant. The other claims the deal was a veiled takeover, orchestrated to bilk shareholders out of billions in compensation.
A three-year battle between billionaire investor Kirk Kerkorian's Tracinda Corp. and German-American automaker DaimlerChrysler AG is scheduled to come to a head Monday in U.S. District Court in Wilmington, Del.
Barring a last-minute settlement or delay, the trial will feature testimony from the reclusive Kerkorian and top executives of DaimlerChrysler, including chairman Jurgen Schrempp.
Also set to testify is former Chrysler Corp. chairman Robert Eaton, a central figure in the deal's negotiations.
Kerkorian sued DaimlerChrysler in 2000 after the London-based Financial Times quoted Schrempp as saying he never meant for the 1998 merger to be one of equals, and that the deal was billed that way "for psychological reasons."
Chrysler shareholders, including Kerkorian, claim they were duped into approving the so-called merger when in reality Daimler-Benz was acquiring Chrysler.
Kerkorian, whose Tracinda investment arm once held 14 percent of Chrysler's stock, says Schrempp -- then chairman of Daimler-Benz -- and other company officials misled shareholders to cheat them out of an acquisition fee that would have been due had Chrysler been purchased.
Some observers have estimated a judgment for Kerkorian could amount to $3 billion to $4 billion.
Gerald Meyers, former chairman of American Motors and now a faculty member at the University of Michigan, said Kerkorian has a chance to enrich himself further while also showing he's "dedicated to the proposition that shareholders should be treated better."
At the same time, Schrempp and DaimlerChrysler must try to show that Kerkorian's claims result from a misinterpretation among shareholders of a complicated business deal, Meyers said.
DaimlerChrysler has stated Kerkorian not only approved of the acquisition but pushed for its completion, and that a Tracinda executive sat on Chrysler's board during the process.
Key to the case, Meyers said, are Schrempp's comments to the Financial Times.
"Deep down I think he didn't mean to get caught, but he got caught," Meyers said. "He got caught saying something that either wasn't true or it was true and he shouldn't have said it."
Last week, U.S. District Judge Joseph J. Farnan Jr. rejected DaimlerChrysler's final attempts to have the case dismissed, saying evidence suggests the deal was a covert takeover from the outset.
"Tracinda's evidence demonstrates that defendants mounted a full-scale communications campaign aimed at concealing their intent to take control of Chrysler and pressing the 'merger of equals' concept," Farnan, who will preside over the trial, said in a ruling.
Earlier this year, in another ruling, Farnan said there was no merit to DaimlerChrysler's claim that numerous newspaper and magazine articles were among "storm warnings" that the deal was not a merger of equals.
Farnan ruled the automaker did not establish that information available to shareholders was "sufficient as a matter of law to alert a reasonable investor to the possibility of fraud."
"Even if these articles were grounded in more than mere media speculation, they were substantially offset by other public reports and articles and by defendants' assurances ... the merger was an equal combination of the two companies," the ruling said.
Also this month, Farnan ruled that he, rather than a jury, will decide the case.
DaimlerChrysler attorney Michael Schell has said he considered the ruling for a bench trial a victory for the company because it upholds an agreement made between the two sides when the deal was finalized in 1998.
At the time, Schell said, Tracinda agreed that any legal disputes resulting from the merger would be heard by a judge. Tracinda had since asked for a jury trial.
In August, DaimlerChrysler agreed to pay $300 million to settle a similar class-action lawsuit filed by other investors who also claimed they were misled about the deal.
At the time, the automaker said it believed the suit seeking $22 billion was groundless, but it agreed to the settlement "since a local jury could reach a different conclusion."
That settlement had no bearing on the Kerkorian case.
The trial is expected to last about two weeks.