The
date is Monday January 14th. On my voice mail is a call from Greg
Stuart, IAB President and CEO. "Have you seen today's Wall Street
Journal?" He asked. "Can you believe this? Why didn't they bother
to ask someone who knows something about Online Advertising? Call
me."
It's
another Monday morning in the world of Online Advertising, and not
a particularly good Monday. The article Greg was referring to was
a special section in the Journal devoted to "fixing" online advertising.The
article went as far as to assert that "Online ads have failed to
either spur sales or support content." Unfortunately, this type
of unsubstantiated malign of Online advertising is far too typical
and is symptomatic of a general uninformed opinion related to online
advertising effectiveness.
The
article went as far as to assert that "Online ads have failed to
either spur sales or support content."
The
better informed know that Online advertising generates sales, and
using the groundbreaking new research from MSN, IAB and the ARF
for a packaged goods and an automotive brands as an indicator, Online
advertising can perform better than Television and Magazines. In
fact, Online's share of the total advertising budget should be increased
from the current range of two to a four percent to a ten to twenty
percent range.
So
why did the reporter from the Wall Street Journal and I draw such
different conclusions this Monday morning about the fate and success
of Online advertising?
We
both draw our conclusions from talking with others. The Wall Street
Journal author asked five people from diverse walks of life for
their creative ideas to "fix" online advertising. The reporter interviewed
a magician, performance artist, author, cartoonist and a puppet
maker. Yes, indeed, that's who the Journal interviewed for this
story. I am not exaggerating.
I too
interview people from diverse walks of life. I interview projectable
samples of thousands of consumers and measure their brand attitudes
and purchase intentions through surveys. I interview leaders in
advertising agencies, and leading research firms and analyze the
findings of the research they've performed. I engage with marketers
and review results of their research efforts.
I suppose
we draw different conclusions because we talk to different people
and ask different questions. I do not pre-suppose that Online marketing
(or any marketing for that matter) works or fails. Instead, I objectively
establish a benchmark for success and ask quantitative marketing
questions to measure against the benchmark.
Online
advertising is generally more cost efficient than Television and
Magazine advertising in terms of producing branding increases.
Take
the MSN/IAB/ARF cross-media advertising study for example. Our benchmark
of success: Three key branding metrics (1) brand awareness, (2)
brand image, and (3) purchase intent.
The
people we asked: US adult women - 12,990 of them.
The
objective: Measure how well Television, Magazine and Online advertising
moved the needle on the key branding metrics.
Our
findings: Online advertising is an important part of the marketing
mix. It works synergistically with Television and Magazine advertising.
However, Online advertising is generally more cost efficient than
Television and Magazine advertising in terms of producing increases
in branding. Therefore, marketers should consider increasing Online's
share in the marketing mix. Making more budget available for Online
advertising will allow markets to increase Online's reach, frequency
or both, and by doing so, achieve better overall branding results.
The
implications of this research are far reaching and critical to marketers.
If you haven't had a chance to review this study, check out http://advantage.msn.com.
The point is, quantitative measurement like this ground breaking
study provides real-world evidence that Online advertising is not
only effective, in many cases it may be more cost efficient that
Television or Magazine advertising.
Internet
Is Powerful Complement to Traditional Advertising Media
Groundbreaking Results From Advertising Research
Foundation, Interactive Advertising Bureau, MSN and Unilever
Home & Personal Care's Dove Further Validate Promise Of Online
Advertising
NEW YORK -- Feb. 6, 2002 -- In a joint presentation to agency
and corporate advertising executives, the Advertising Research
Foundation (ARF), the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB),
the MSN¨ network of Internet services from Microsoft Corp.,
and researcher Rex Briggs today announced the results of groundbreaking
new research that validates the importance of online advertising.
The culmination of a yearlong investigation of the relative
effectiveness of and synergies between online and traditional
media advertising, the research found that online advertising's
share in the media mix can have a significant increase in the
effectiveness of an overall advertising campaign. With the support
of ARF and IAB methodology, MSN commissioned Briggs to examine
the role the Internet plays in the advertising mix of a consumer
package goods brand.
Although recent studies have proven that online advertising
is an effective branding medium, today's research marks one
of the first times online advertising was studied in tandem
within an overall advertising campaign and therefore provides
more realistic results.
Until
today, media planners and buyers often were challenged to
quantify the benefits of increasing online advertising's share
of the media mix. Today's study is one of the first of its
kind to measure the effectiveness of recent advertising campaigns
by working with Unilever Home & Personal Care's Dove Nutrium
Bar in the real world and real time. These are the research
conclusions:
- The
research suggests that CPG brands that increase their
online advertising may result in increased key metrics,
such as brand awareness, brand attributes and purchase
intent.
-
Higher online frequency boosts branding effectiveness.
Specifically, increasing the number of online impressions
from six impressions to 12 impressions over six weeks
can increase Dove Nutrium Bar's overall branding effectiveness
by 42 percent.
-
TV, print and online advertising are each effective at
branding, yet online is generally more cost-efficient
in terms of branding increases from the pre-campaign level.
"We've
seen lots of proof that online advertising works, but this
is the first time we have measured how online really stacks
up to television and magazines," said Jim Spaeth, president
of ARF. "The results are a giant leap forward for the advertising
industry, addressing a question it has long been pondering."
|
Direct
research measuring the actual performance of advertising is one
way we can understand whether online advertising works. But it can
be expensive and time consuming. A reporter at the Wall Street Journal
is not likely to commission one of these studies on their own. And
in fairness to the Journal, their Online property has done some
fine advertising effectiveness work on behalf of their advertisers,
which has demonstrated that Online advertising can be effective
at achieving marketing goals.
And,
I listen to the experts. I ask them about the research they've done,
and what it tells them. I encourage reporters to ask the same question.
Ask the two largest package goods firms and one of the world's leading
sales tracking research firms IRI (Information Resources Inc.).
Through research they conducted, they found that in a carefully
controlled study of in-market sales effects, even the humble online
advertising banner could increase sales for a new Laundry detergent
product (for Unilever) and a snack food product (P&G) in the grocery
store.
Simply
put, in most cases, online advertising was the most efficient vehicle
in driving e-commerce sales.
Ask
Grey Advertising. Their Beyond Interactive unit has done fine work
comparing the sales effects generated by Television, Radio, Print
and Online advertisements. Michele Madansky, Ph.D., the SVP
of Marketing Intelligence could share with you the dozen marketing
mix studies conducted that led her clients to devote a greater proportion
of their budgets to online advertising. Simply put, in most cases,
online advertising was the most efficient vehicle in driving e-commerce
sales.
Ask
the ad serving companies that track actual ad exposure and sales.
They found that not only could online achieve their conversion goals,
it often does so without the consumer clicking on the ads. Instead
the consumer remembers the message and returns to the site on their
own accord. According to the Avenue A study, 80% of the new registrations
generated by the advertising on one of the top 10 travel websites
were driven by people who didn't click on the ad, but came to the
site because they got the message from the advertisement (much the
same way conventional advertising works to generate sales).
Ask
Pepsi's John Vail. When it comes to thinking outside the box, we
see IAB members and innovative marketers breaking new ground. Through
innovative online promotions, Pepsi expanded their volume sales
by more than 5 percent while their peers in their category barely
grew at 0.06% according to Nielsen sales data.
Ask Radio Shack. Through their innovative racing games on MSN's
Gamezone they've expanded their market share in the radio control
category. Radio Shack reported record toy sales and they attribute
this success largely to their online advertising efforts on MSN.
Ask
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter. They conducted an exhaustive study of
the relative effectiveness and cost efficiency of online and offline
advertising and concluded that online is not only effective, it
is often more cost efficient than TV, Magazines, and Radio in achieving
advertisers' branding goals.
In
fact, if we look at all the advertisements measured, we could find
over 1000 measurements of
online ads - the majority of which demonstrate that online advertising
is effective in building brand and
spurring sales. Could a puppet maker, magician, author, cartoonist
and performance artist be right about Online advertising and all
these studies be mistaken?
2001
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Advertising Report:
"Banners
exceed or are as good as magazines, newspapers and television
in generating brand recall and brand interest... When
branding is considered in terms of cost effectiveness,
banners look even better" |
(Comparison of norms for Online, TV, Print and direct marketing
options)
|
Can
we make it better? Indeed the IAB members, leading advertising agencies,
marketers and
researchers
are working every day to improve the medium for advertisers.
I applaud
the industry for coming together and launching new larger formats,
embracing rich media standards thereby encouraging the adoption
of more interactive advertising and eye catching
content, streamlining measurement standards, supporting research
like the cross-media advertising study and constantly encouraging
new research to surface new ideas that can make online, an already
effective advertising vehicle, work even better.
It's
the Monday after the press conference announcing the results of
the MSN/IAB/ARF cross media advertising effectiveness study. I check
my voice mail. It is Greg Stuart again. His message: "Got another
call from a marketer and they want to be part of the next round
of cross-media research. They want to see where Online should fit
into their mix. They're very excited about this study. Call me."
Some Mondays are better than others.
Online's
role in the Marketing Mix?
The
IAB is working with leading marketers on another round
of Marketing Mix research. Marketers can participate
on a first come, first served basis with category exclusivity.
If you would like to participate, or be kept up to date
on results, please contact Jonas Fischer, IAB Acct.
Exec. - Jonas@IAB.net
or tel. 212-949-2432.
Measuring Success: Measuring Success is an ongoing
series of articles by the IAB examining Online advertising
theory, practice and results. The focus is on measuring
Online advertising success.
www.IAB.net/measuringsuccess
About
the Author: Rex Briggs is
an expert on marketing and measurement. He consults
to the IAB on research matters. Mr. Briggs leads the
firm Marketing Evolution, which focuses measuring and
boosting return-on-investment from marketing efforts.
His counsel is sought by leading marketers, advertising
agencies and publishers.
rex@marketingevolution.com
|
|
|