The Auto Channel
The Largest Independent Automotive Research Resource
The Largest Independent Automotive Research Resource
Official Website of the New Car Buyer

Run-Flat Tires Letting Air Out of Customer Satisfaction


jd power

Michelin Ranks Highest in Luxury, Passenger Car Segments;

Pirelli Ranks Highest in Performance Sport Segment

WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA -- March 26, 2015: Customers with run-flat tires are less satisfied overall and replace tires more frequently in the first two years of ownership than do those with non-run-flat tires, according to the J.D. Power 2015 U.S. Original Equipment Tire Customer Satisfaction StudySM released today.

The study measures tire owner satisfaction in four vehicle segments: luxury, passenger car, performance sport and truck/utility.1 Satisfaction is examined in four factors: tire wear; tire ride; tire appearance; and tire traction/handling. Rankings are based on owner experiences with their tires after two years of vehicle ownership.

The study finds that overall satisfaction among owners of run-flat tires lags that of owners of non-run-flat tires across the luxury, passenger car and performance sport segments, a pattern consistent with previous iterations of the study. The difference is most pronounced in the performance sport segment, where satisfaction with non-run-flat tires averages 685 points on a 1,000-point scale and satisfaction with run-flat tires averages 612. In the luxury segment, satisfaction with run-flat tires is 24 points lower than with non-run-flat tires (688 vs. 712, respectively).

In all three of the rank-eligible segments, the largest gaps in satisfaction are in tire ride and tire wear.

"The use of run-flat tires is likely to increase as automakers continue to view them as a viable option for improving fuel efficiency by eliminating the need for a spare tire, thereby reducing the weight," said Brent Gruber, director, global automotive division at J.D. Power. "It's vital that auto and tire manufacturers address the ride and wear issues, which are still not meeting customer expectations. Customers expect that run-flat tires won't compromise tread life or the ability to provide a quiet and comfortable ride."

Owners with run-flat tires also replace tires more frequently in the first two years of ownership than do non-run-flat customers. While the replacement rate for run-flat tires owners is slightly higher in the first year of ownership (10% vs. 7%, respectively), the discrepancy becomes more pronounced in the second year of ownership, when 27 percent of run-flat tire owners replaced at least one tire, compared with 16 percent of non-run-flat tire owners.

"While tire manufacturers have made improvements in addressing dealers' reluctance to repair run-flat tires in the same way they would non-run-flat tires, customers with run-flat tires are still replacing them at a much higher rate," said Gruber. "Manufacturers need to continue making progress in this area in order to increase satisfaction and loyalty among their run-flat tire customers."

Key Findings

Tire brand image influences customer satisfaction with the product. Manufacturers that convey an image of product value and environmental responsibility positively influence overall customer satisfaction. However, a customer's image of the brand can erode over time if the product ultimately fails to meet their performance expectations. Projecting the right image for the brand is crucial, as 51 percent of customers who intend to purchase new tires cite brand reputation as a criterion for purchase, the highest among all purchase criteria.

For owners who have replaced one or more of their original equipment tires within the last eighteen months, the most commonly cited criterion when selecting their new tires is that they match the other tires already on the vehicle. This is true for both purchase (32%) and lease (48%) customers. The second most frequently cited criterion is a recommendation from a sales or service person, cited by 11 percent of customers. Past experience with a tire brand and the advice from sales and service personnel are also very influential considerations when purchasing tires.

Among generational groups,2 Gen Y customers rely more heavily on their family and friends as a source of information for which replacement tire brand to purchase than do the older generations.

Study Rankings3

Michelin ranks highest in two of the three rank-eligible segments: luxury (745) and passenger car (714). Pirelli ranks highest in the performance sport segment (693).

Pirelli ranks second in the luxury segment (710), while Goodyear ranks second in the passenger car segment (669). In the performance sport segment, Michelin ranks second (692) and Goodyear third (691).

The 2015 U.S. Original Equipment Tire Customer Satisfaction Study is based on responses from more than 29,000 original owners of 2013 or 2014 model-year vehicles. The study was fielded in November and December 2014.

Overall Tire Satisfaction Index Rankings  

J.D. Power.com Power Circle RatingsTM

(Based on a 1,000-point scale) 

For Consumers



Luxury Segment  



Michelin  

745

5

Pirelli 

710

3

Luxury Segment Average 

702

3

Goodyear

701

3

Dunlop  

676

2

Continental 

667

2

Bridgestone 

663

2

Passenger Car Segment 



Michelin 

714

5

Goodyear 

669

4

Passenger Car Segment Average 

644

3

Bridgestone 

639

3

Pirelli  

631

3

Continental 

630

3

Yokohama 

626

3

Toyo 

622

3

Firestone 

621

3

Dunlop

611

2

Hankook 

607

2

Kumho  

594

2


Note: Included in the study but not ranked due to small sample size are BFGoodrich and Nexen.


Performance Sport Segment 



Pirelli  

693

5

Michelin 

692

5

Goodyear  

691

5

Performance Sport Segment Average

669

3

Bridgestone 

627

2

Continental 

621

2




Note: Included in the study but not ranked due to small sample size are Dunlop, Firestone, Kumho, Toyo, and Yokohama.

Power Circle Ratings Legend
5 – Among the best
4 – Better than most
3 – About average
2 – The rest