Consumers Union: New Fuel Standards Good For Americans

But First Snide�s Remarks: At The Auto Channel we believe that �MPG� is not the real issue, but MPG of what fuel? When MPG once again becomes just an economic measurement and not a national security and economic issue America will be better off. Any new mileage standard while a baby-step improvement still insures that Americans remain beholden to OPEC, and continues to support Big Oil's more than profitable 100 year monopoly, which by any measure is unarguably Not Good for America.

See what The Auto Channel has been saying about the apparent collusionary "new rules" and why they guarantee that American's remain slaves to countries and regimes that hate us, our way of life and keeps us mired in our oil induced economic slump. HERE What do you think; msnide@theautochannel.com

CU files formal comments at U.S. DOT in support of higher fuel economy standards

WASHINGTON February 14, 2012; Consumers Union (CU), the policy and advocacy division of Consumer Reports, filed comments in support of proposed fuel economy standards at the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) on Monday.

The proposed standards issued by DOT’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would require a corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) level of 54.5 miles-per-gallon by the year 2025.

In addition to Consumers Union’s formal comments, more than 27,000 consumers submitted their own comments in support of the higher standards in response to an e-mail alert sent by CU. In its comments, the organization said: “The proposed target is reasonable and provides excellent value for consumers. Improving fuel economy standards serves important national security, economic, and environmental goals and provides outstanding consumer benefits. A more efficient fleet will save consumers thousands of dollars in fuel costs. Although consumers will be paying slightly more money for more efficient vehicles, they will more than recover this investment through savings at the pump. Once fully implemented, the standards will save most car buyers money in the very first month of ownership.”

In a recent Consumer Reports survey, consumers demonstrated strong support for fuel efficiency standards, a desire for alternative fuel vehicle options and a willingness to pay for more efficient technology. Ninety-three percent said they believed that fuel efficiency standards for all vehicles should be improved. Seventy-two percent of consumers who planned to buy a vehicle said they would consider an alternative power train, such as hybrid, electric, flex-fuel or natural gas, and 83% were willing to pay extra for a fuel-efficient vehicle if the payback from lower fuel costs was less than five years.

CU’s comments were submitted by Ellen Bloom, CU’s Director of Federal Policy and the Washington Office; Shannon Baker-Branstetter, CU Policy Counsel; and David Champion, Director of Auto Testing for Consumer Reports. Members of Consumers Union and Consumer Reports recently testified in support of the rules at public hearings held by EPA and NHTSA. For a copy of CU’s formal comments, please contact David Butler at dbutler@consumer.org or Kara Kelber at kkelber@consumer.org